Tuesday, July 29, 2008

Do we want a childless Philippines?

I direct you to Dr. William E. May who writes "'Childless Europe,' Humanae Vitae, and Familiaris Consortio". He begins:

The Sunday, June 29, 2008 edition of The New York Times Magazine featured a very interesting and provocative essay by Richard Sharto entitled “Childless Europe: What happens to a continent when it stops making babies?” I believe that its publication, coming a few days before the beginning of July, 2008, a month marking the 40th anniversary of Pope John Paul II’s encyclical Humanae Vitae was providential.

It is not only Sharto who talks of this basic problem in Europe. In 1990, I was in Rome preparing for the eventual start of my school in Cebu. I was then in Centro ELIS, the NGO-partner of CITE. In one conversation with a pediatrician who was living with his family in the quartiere Tiburtina, he commented that he was not getting as much patients. I told him that he should be thankful that children are more healthy now. He looks at me (with the "where is this guy from?" look) and almost rebukes me: If only that were the case, caro amico. Not only sick children go and see their pediatricians; even healthy ones go regularly also. The real reason is that there simply are less children. I wonder, but I shouldn't, considering that so many do the baby-making act, if you understand what I mean."

Many have written about similar declines and the ill-effects happening in many other countries. I remember that during a break in one technical education workshop I attended in Tokyo, a workshop staff and I were looking out the window towards a 6-story building across the street. He told me that the building used to be an elementary and high school and that about 3 years before, the school closed down. Before I could ask him for the reason, he added that it was due to the fact that there were very few students because simply this part of Tokyo did not have families with children anymore -- true in many other parts. I told him that if only we could transfer the building to Cebu for the use of schoolchildren in my city, I'd be the first to ask for it. He countered that if only he had the authority and the technology to do it, he'd have given it to me as we spoke.

I am happy that many of our students are now abroad with very good jobs. Most of our graduates outside the country are in Singapore. And Singapore is in need of workers because local talent is just not enough. Mostly testament to past advocacies on contraception, no less. This story is repeated many times in many countries.

And yet here we are in RP wanting to experience situations that these countries are dying to get out from. Reminds me, perhaps not a very good analogy, of something that a former teacher at graduate school told me. He said that the Philippines was fond of following the US. It is not really bad in itself, but it seems we follow most of the evil and less of the good. He says one of the good that we did not follow: the railway system. And how about the evil? Too many to mention, but one is artificial contraception.

Here we are, simply fulfilling the prophecy that is Humanae Vitae:

Consequences of Artificial Methods

17. Responsible men can become more deeply convinced of the truth of the doctrine laid down by the Church on this issue if they reflect on the consequences of methods and plans for artificial birth control. Let them first consider how easily this course of action could open wide the way for marital infidelity and a general lowering of moral standards. Not much experience is needed to be fully aware of human weakness and to understand that human beings—and especially the young, who are so exposed to temptation—need incentives to keep the moral law, and it is an evil thing to make it easy for them to break that law. Another effect that gives cause for alarm is that a man who grows accustomed to the use of contraceptive methods may forget the reverence due to a woman, and, disregarding her physical and emotional equilibrium, reduce her to being a mere instrument for the satisfaction of his own desires, no longer considering her as his partner whom he should surround with care and affection.

Finally, careful consideration should be given to the danger of this power passing into the hands of those public authorities who care little for the precepts of the moral law. Who will blame a government which in its attempt to resolve the problems affecting an entire country resorts to the same measures as are regarded as lawful by married people in the solution of a particular family difficulty? Who will prevent public authorities from favoring those contraceptive methods which they consider more effective? Should they regard this as necessary, they may even impose their use on everyone. It could well happen, therefore, that when people, either individually or in family or social life, experience the inherent difficulties of the divine law and are determined to avoid them, they may give into the hands of public authorities the power to intervene in the most personal and intimate responsibility of husband and wife.

Limits to Man's Power

Consequently, unless we are willing that the responsibility of procreating life should be left to the arbitrary decision of men, we must accept that there are certain limits, beyond which it is wrong to go, to the power of man over his own body and its natural functions—limits, let it be said, which no one, whether as a private individual or as a public authority, can lawfully exceed. These limits are expressly imposed because of the reverence due to the whole human organism and its natural functions, in the light of the principles We stated earlier, and in accordance with a correct understanding of the "principle of totality" enunciated by Our predecessor Pope Pius XII. (21)

Concern of the Church

18. It is to be anticipated that perhaps not everyone will easily accept this particular teaching. There is too much clamorous outcry against the voice of the Church, and this is intensified by modern means of communication. But it comes as no surprise to the Church that she, no less than her divine Founder, is destined to be a "sign of contradiction." (22) She does not, because of this, evade the duty imposed on her of proclaiming humbly but firmly the entire moral law, both natural and evangelical.

Since the Church did not make either of these laws, she cannot be their arbiter—only their guardian and interpreter. It could never be right for her to declare lawful what is in fact unlawful, since that, by its very nature, is always opposed to the true good of man.

In preserving intact the whole moral law of marriage, the Church is convinced that she is contributing to the creation of a truly human civilization. She urges man not to betray his personal responsibilities by putting all his faith in technical expedients. In this way she defends the dignity of husband and wife. This course of action shows that the Church, loyal to the example and teaching of the divine Savior, is sincere and unselfish in her regard for men whom she strives to help even now during this earthly pilgrimage "to share God's life as sons of the living God, the Father of all men." (23)

I hope we become the exception.

Friday, July 25, 2008

Packard and leave?

A PDI story entitled "US donor hits Arroyo policy on population" begins:

"A top United States-based benefactor of population management programs worldwide has criticized President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo for backing the Catholic Church’s hard-line position on reproductive health (RH) issues."

The report on the Philippines can be seen here, where it says among other things:

"Large families are one reason why 40 percent of the 85 million Filipinos live in extreme poverty. Many women and couples are highly motivated to plan their family size but have difficulty accessing contraceptives and quality services. Even though abortion is illegal and postabortion care scarce, hundreds of thousands of women make the difficult decision to abort their pregnancies, often in unsafe conditions.

"The Philippines was one of Southeast Asia’s first countries to develop a national population policy. Yet the fervent opposition of the Catholic Church to contraception continues to hamper service delivery and policy implementation. Under the current administration of President Gloria Macapagal- Arroyo, the federal government has refused to buy contraceptives, worsening the shortage.

"The program’s top priorities in the Philippines included expanding rural families’ contraceptive options through innovative models of service delivery and outreach, improving postabortion care, and increasing access to information and services for youth. Foundation grantees achieved significant gains in all three areas and made important inroads toward improving the policy environment, despite the fact that support from other donors for local NGOs was on the decline."

The report continues by naming the foundations and government agencies that the Foundation helped (the funding amounts can be found in other portions of the main report). Now despite the US$23 million worth of grants to 29 organizations, it would seem that the desired result has not been achieved.

US$23 MILLION! Do you think the foundation has been had?

PS. The report says the Philippines has a federal government. Do they know something we don't. A sitting Senator of the Philippines is pushing for federalism. Will he get funding from the foundation to campaign for this change in form of government? Or will the foundation allow themselves to be had? again?

Should they now pack up and leave? Maybe not yet, for they believe:
"... even modest investments in innovative approaches can achieve meaningful results."

Tuesday, July 22, 2008

Beyond the numbers

World Youth Day 2008 ended last Sunday. Here are words from the Holy Father in a get-together with WYD volunteers before he left for Rome on Monday.

"In the crowds that have assembled here in Sydney we have seen a vivid expression of the unity-in-diversity of the universal Church, a vision in microcosm of the united human family that we long to see.

"Those experiences of prayer, and our joyful celebration of the Eucharist, were an eloquent testimony to the life-giving work of the Holy Spirit, present and active in the hearts of our young people. World Youth Day has shown us that the Church can rejoice in the young people of today and be filled with hope for the world of tomorrow."

Even as we should look beyond the numbers, here are some from National Catholic Registrar WYD blog:

WYD Numbers

For a breakdown on the WYD numbers, here are a few:

223,000 total pilgrims

110,000 overseas pilgrims from 170 nations

3.5 million meals served in 400 venues

8,000 volunteers

2,000 accredited media

4,000 priests and deacons

420 bishops and 26 cardinals

Pilgrims consumed 215,000 meat pies, 360,000 lamingtons, and 100,000 litres of milk.

1.1 million communion hosts were produced for WYD Masses and 1,000 priests heard confessions


Wednesday, July 16, 2008

SambaMilan

AC Milan have acquired Ronaldinho!

A.C.MILAN OFFICIAL ANNOUNCEMENT
7/15/2008

AC Milan and FC Barcelona have reached an agreement for the transfer of Ronaldinho to the Rossoneri's club. Tomorrow the player will be in Milan for the medical and to sign the contract which will tie him to Milan until June 30th 2011.

Tuesday, July 15, 2008

The Pope in retreat

Pope Benedict is in retreat prior to World Youth Day festivities in Sydney. He is staying at Kenthurst Center in the outskirts of Sydney.

Here is a picture of the Mass he celebrated on the day he arrived at Kenthurst.

H/T: Australia Incognita


Wednesday, July 09, 2008

They don't know love

In a 1957, Mike Wallace interviewed Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger who talked "about why she became an advocate for birth control, over-population, the Catholic Church, and morality." If one reads the transcript, one can agree on what Dawn Eden says in her blog of MS, "There's no eugenicist like an old eugenicist."

There is one stinging rebuke that she makes of the Church, and I should say that it is MS who doesn't know how to love.

Here I quote from that interview:

WALLACE: Well let's look at the official Catholic position...opposition to Birth-Control. I read now from a church publication called "The Question Box" in forbidding Birth Control it says the following: It says the immediate purpose and primary end of marriage is the begetting of children, when the marital relation is so used as to render the fulfillment of its purposes impossible--that is by Birth Control--it is used unethically and unnaturally. Now what's wrong with that position?

SANGER: Well, it's very wrong, it's not normal it's -- it has the wrong attitude towards marriage, toward love, toward the relationships between men and women.

WALLACE: Well the natural law they say is that first of all the primary function of sex in marriage is to beget children. Do you disagree with that?

SANGER: I disagree with that a hundred percent.

WALLACE: Your feeling is what then?

SANGER: My feeling is that love and attraction between men and women, in many cases the very finest relationship has nothing to do with bearing a child. It's secondary. Many, many times and we know that --you see your birth rates and you can talk to people who have very happy marriages and they're not having babies every year. Yes, I think that's a celibate attitude...

WALLACE: Surely, a celibate attitude but you agree that Catholicism according to the tenets of Catholicism they rule that birth control violates not only the church's position --it isn't the church's position but they say it violates a natural law as I have just explained, therefore birth control is a sin no matter who practices it. Now the violation of the natural law--you certainly can take no issue with the natural law as the hierarchy of the Catholic Church regards it...

SANGER: Oh, I certainly do take issue with it and I think it's untrue and I think it's unnatural.

WALLACE: Well let me ask you

SANGER: ... It's an unnatural attitude to take --how do they know? I mean, after all, they're celibates.They don't know love, they don't know marriage, they know nothing about bringing up children nor any of the marriage problems of life, and yet they speak to people as if they were God.

Unfair and most untrue. Even then, the Church hierarchy has asked the laity in consultation in many of her decrees and pronouncements. As she does today. And I do not believe that she speaks as if she were God.


Tuesday, July 08, 2008

No Good Organizations

One of the most tracked stories of last week was the Colombian Army's daring rescue of Ingrid Betancourt, 3 American defense contractors, and 11 other Colombians held hostage by the FARC for years. Definitely feel-good story.

The Colombian Army fooled the FARC into thinking that they were handing over the hostages to a FARC bigwig through an NGO.

Leaves a bad taste in the mouth since I work for an NGO. Now, why would FARC trust an NGO? Is it because FARC has dealt with NGO's before? NGO's that favored them? NGO's are non-government, yes, but should they be anti-government, working with rebels, helping them transfer hostages?

It is no wonder that governments are wary of NGO's sometimes.

Read here.

How the Hostages Were Rescued - Operation Jaque

In an operation codenamed "Jaque" members of the Colombian armed forces over time were able to infiltrate the ranks of the FARC and persuade a guerrilla known only as "Cesar" to move the high profile hostages to a pre-agreed spot for a helicopter rendezvous with an NGO. This NGO would then supposedly move the hostages to a secure place to meet potentially with the new leader of the FARC Alfonso Cano or possibly with FARC Secretariat member Mono Jojoy. The NGO in question was of course fictitious and as soon as the helicopter was airborne the Colombian military let it be known that the captives were on their way to freedom, first to San Jose del Guaviare and then later on to Bogota.

Or here.
Undercover Colombian commandoes flew to the jungle camp in a civilian helicopter, claiming to be from a fictitious non-government organisation.

There's been a buzz that "rebels" in the whole world will no longer deal with people who wear Che Guevara shirts or use anything with Che Guevara. Attention to "negotiators". You might be regarded as double crossers?

BTW, do your children like spicy food or foreign food? If they have aversion to these food, chances are they'll turn out to be declared as RACISTS! At least if they are in the UK. You cannot make this up. Read here.

Thanks to my Momma who fed me well. Thanks Ma.

Tuesday, July 01, 2008

Proud to be Cebuano? again?

This is another one of those.
Confusing indeed..
Why the frown?
What's this for?>>>

Proud to be Cebuano?

In a recent trip to my hometown in Mindanao, some friends and acquaintances commented especially when I talk that I have become Bisaya. Even as my Bisaya accent and vocabulary have improved through the more than half of my lifetime spent in Cebu, I tell them that I do not consider myself Bisaya.

I am still a Mindanaoan. True, I was born in Manila but my parents, both from Mindanao, came back to the Land of Promise soon after I was born and they have lived there ever since. I went to university in Manila, staying there a little over five years, and has since lived in Cebu City for almost twenty.

For about ten years now, however, I have made fortnightly trips to Mindanao for an average of 6 days a month. I still consider me, Mindanaoan.

There are just many instances when "being Cebuano" is not something to be proud of (sounding like Michelle Obama in her "hasn’t had a real moment of pride in her country" spiel some months back). One is the Cebuanos's penchant for throwing stuff into the playing field (and to the people and players in the sporting field or stage) when a decision is not favorable. Of course, hey, this happens in many places. But then why be like those in other places?

Then recently Elai narrates of a trip she makes to Cebu, an otherwise enjoyable trip to a Cebu tourist spot, with a little hitch -- she says, "ripped off".

Okay. okay, this happens in many places too. But why do we need to do as others do when we can always do better?
My hunch was that it was because of the company I was with. Like aliens carry millions of cash in their backpacks. And this company of mine told me that its unbelievable, that I get ripped off in my own country. So if you plan to go there too...i recommend you go there and get away from the noisy city. And just enjoy nature. But by all means, be smarter than me, and beware of the bad guys.
Makes me almost think, as my evil twin: GABA. GABA. GABA.

The links forzamillan made in this blog do not in any way suggest that the authors of those blogs and articles linked to support my thinking. Only that these appeared as the first ones in a google search -- evil twin.


Monday, June 30, 2008

Onomastico

Auguri! Auguri! Auguri!

If I were in Rome yesterday, I would have celebrated my onomastico (literally, name-day; but we would have celebrated it as Saint's Day), the Feast of Sts. Peter and Paul.

What makes this year's celebration extra special is that the Holy Father Pope Benedict XVI declared a Pauline Year from the Feast of Sts. Peter and Paul this year up to the next celebration of this feast on June 29, 2009.

More on this here.


Here's a another piece of good news, well, for me and then some.



¡ARRIBA ESPAÑA!

Missed the Germany-Spain Euro 2008 finals match.
Then the RSS feed came:
¡ARRIBA ESPAÑA!
I knew. I just knew.

Read on.


Sunday, June 29, 2008

Road trip


Road trip
Originally uploaded by asmillan3
The road trip I took from Polomolok, South Cotabato to Cagayan de Oro City end of May was a first for me. I thought I would be going to Davao and take the BUDA route to CdO. I realized, and the confirmation from my parents and some friends, that the Polomolok to CdO route via Cotabato could be a shorter trip. It took me through six provinces for a total of 11 hours from the time I took the Harly bus from Polomolok, to switching to Rural Tours bus in Tacurong, and eventually setting foot in Cagayan de Oro City.

The only regret is that I could have done the road trip in a span of many more days, instead of having a go at it for half a day only. Work beckoned, you see.

I have taken that route to Kabacan years ago, during martial law days, whenever we would go to Cotabato City for vacation. Most of the roads were unpaved. Those trips to Cotabato would take half a day also, until the concreting of the western route was completed and travel time was cut to about three hours.

Over the years though, the old route was developed and the roads now are very good.

Kabacan is a major stopover point. Buses from Davao Sur and Kidapawan on their way to Cotabato City, and vice versa; and people who wish to go to Bukidnon, Northern Mindanao, and Western Mindanao from Cotabato and the SOCSARKGEN area stop at Kabacan to catch another bus. In fact, my seatmate from Kabacan to CdO, got on the Rural Tours bus after getting off a Cotabato-Davao bus earlier.

I saw a lot of rice fields so I do not understand why people in the area were complaining of the high cost of rice. There was corn, lots of them, and some even being dried on the highways. Mindanao is rich.

Only once did military personnel board the bus for inspection -- when entering Carmen town.

There are many school buildings constructed through the help of USAID, as well as the Japanese and Spanish aid agencies.

Wednesday, June 25, 2008

Slippery Slope

David Mills on the slippery slope.

Excerpts:
You want contraception; someone else wants easy divorce. You want easy divorce; someone else wants homosexual marriages. You want homosexual marriages; someone else wants threesomes. You want threesomes; someone else wants children. You want children; someone else wants sheep. And his reason for wanting sheep will be just as good as yours for wanting contraception or easy divorce or homosexual marriages.

H/T: Dawn

Under her shadow


DoleTrip1019
Originally uploaded by dolekalsangi
Took this shot May 29, on a quick visit to Dolefil. Sixteen years I lived under the shadow of Mt. Matutum. On a clear day on Mt. Apo, one can see Mt. Matutum. Vice-versa is also true I guess.

Even as I grew up under Mt. Matutum's shadow for 16 years in my younger days, I can never stop being mesmerized.

Click on the photo to get to the flickr site and see other photos.


Tuesday, June 24, 2008

You're next

NASA's James Hansen, in a guest post diss at global warming skeptics, says that "CEOs of fossil energy companies know what they are doing and are aware of the long-term consequences of continued business as usual. In my opinion, these CEOs should be tried for high crimes against humanity and nature." (Highlights mine.)

Who's next?

Of course, this is the same James Hansen that was outsmarted by the now 16-yr old Kristen Byrnes. You can also read something about her here and here.

Monday, June 23, 2008

Vigilance

My friend Nono Montalvan writes in his column today in the Philippine Daily Inquirer about the recent move of current members of Congress, co-authors of a "reproductive health bill", to fast-track the passing of their bill.

The Honorable Edcel Lagman, Janette Garin, Narciso Santiago III, Mark Llandro Mendoza, Eleandro Jesus Madrona and Ana Theresa Hontiveros Baraquel would have us believe that their bill respects religious convictions and is not pro-abortion. If only they knew whereof they speak. It is an established fact that the connection between contraception and abortion is not only inseparable; there is a close identity between them.

The unnumbered house bill of these honorable representatives that goes under the lengthy title of “An Act Providing for a National Policy on Reproductive Health, Responsible Parenthood and Population Development, and for other purposes,” and referred to in brevity as the Consolidated Reproductive Health Bill, quietly passed the House Health Committee in an unprecedented two minutes without any decent discussion or appearance of meeting the requirements of the legislative process. With a seeming inclination to do away with lengthy processes simply to rush its approval, the bill is expected to proceed to plenary without dragging along public controversy.


We have to be more vigilant! We are at war. We know the enemy: those who speak the "language of war".

But there was a time when that cheesy phrase, “making love”, actually meant something significant because it pointed to the reality of what sex was, or at least, was supposed to be. Sex was about love. And love meant sacrifice. In contemporary society today, of course, sex is not about love. Sex is about using another person for orgasmic gratification apart from sacrifice.

In our times, sex is not about “making love” but rather “making war”.

H/T: Some have hats.

Another from SHH:




Friday, June 20, 2008

Deception 101

One thing you do not read in the MSM much. Although it was ABCNews that got to it first. Was that deception, ei, Al?

Wednesday, June 18, 2008

California June 17

June 17 marks the day when same-sex marriages will be legal in California. Despite the move to include a vote in the November polls, California will start doing what its State Supreme Court deemed as, well, uhm, ok.

In October 2004, Ed Vitagliano wrote in the American Family Association Journal a piece entitled School's Out. The first three paragraphs below.

Transvestite teachers. Boys kissing boys in restrooms. Teens taught about anal sex. "Gay" fairy tales for children.

Could these things actually become a reality in our public schools? The speed of change in our society thus far, driven by resolute homosexual activists, indicates that the answer is most assuredly yes.

In case some people think such projections about the future are a hunk of homophobic hooey, they might want to consider the fact that, in some parts of the country, these things are already happening.

Ed is a visionary, or a good reader of the times. And he has not been the only one. Reminds me of the visionary Pope Paul VI when he wrote his encyclical Humanae Vitae, promulgated on July 25, almost 40 years ago (1968). They both called what's happening now correctly.

Here are excerpts of Humanae Vitae, that could help us understand what is happening not only in California and in many parts of the world (Greece being the newest to pass a law allowing SSM):

8. Conjugal love reveals its true nature and nobility when it is considered in its supreme origin, God, who is love,6 "the Father, from whom every family in heaven and on earth is named."7

Marriage is not, then, the effect of chance or the product of evolution of unconscious natural forces; it is the wise institution of the Creator to realize in mankind His design of love. By means of the reciprocal personal gift of self, proper and exclusive to them, husband and wife tend towards the communion of their beings in view of mutual personal perfection, to collaborate with God in the generation and education of new lives.

For baptized persons, moreover, marriage invests the dignity of a sacramental sign of grace, inasmuch as it represents the union of Christ and of the Church.

9. Under this light, there clearly appear the characteristic marks and demands of conjugal love, and it is of supreme importance to have an exact idea of these.

This love is first of all fully human, that is to say, of the senses and of the spirit at the same time. It is not, then, a simple transport of instinct and sentiment, but also, and principally, an act of the free will, intended to endure and to grow by means of the joys and sorrows of daily life, in such a way that husband and wife become one only heart and one only soul, and together attain their human perfection.

Then, this love is total, that is to say, it is a very special form of personal friendship, in which husband and wife generously share everything, without undue reservations or selfish calculations. Whoever truly loves his marriage partner loves not only for what he receives, but for the partner's self, rejoicing that he can enrich his partner with the gift of himself.

Again, this love is faithful and exclusive until death. Thus in fact do bride and groom conceive it to be on the day when they freely and in full awareness assume the duty of the marriage bond. A fidelity, this, which can sometimes be difficult, but is always possible, always noble and meritorious, as no one can deny. The example of so many married persons down through the centuries shows, not only that fidelity is according to the nature of marriage, but also that it is a source of profound and lasting happiness.

And finally this love is fecund for it is not exhausted by the communion between husband and wife, but is destined to continue, raising up new lives. "Marriage and conjugal love are by their nature ordained toward the begetting and educating of children. Children are really the supreme gift of marriage and contribute very substantially to the welfare of their parents."8

10. Hence conjugal love requires in husband and wife an awareness of their mission of "responsible parenthood," which today is rightly much insisted upon, and which also must be exactly understood. Consequently it is to be considered under different aspects which are legitimate and connected with one another.

In relation to the biological processes, responsible parenthood means the knowledge and respect of their functions; human intellect discovers in the power of giving life biological laws which are part of the human person.9

In relation to the tendencies of instinct or passion, responsible parenthood means that necessary dominion which reason and will must exercise over them.

In relation to physical, economic, psychological and social conditions, responsible parenthood is exercised, either by the deliberate and generous decision to raise a numerous family, or by the decision, made for grave motives and with due respect for the moral law, to avoid for the time being, or even for an indeterminate period, a new birth.

Responsible parenthood also and above all implies a more profound relationship to the objective moral order established by God, of which a right conscience is the faithful interpreter. The responsible exercise of parenthood implies, therefore, that husband and wife recognize fully their own duties towards God, towards themselves, towards the family and towards society, in a correct hierarchy of values.

In the task of transmitting life, therefore, they are not free to proceed completely at will, as if they could determine in a wholly autonomous way the honest path to follow; but they must conform their activity to the creative intention of God, expressed in the very nature of marriage and of its acts, and manifested by the constant teaching of the Church. 10


Moderate the green

Since taking steps to make his home more environmentally-friendly last June, Gore devours an average of 17,768 kWh per month –1,638 kWh more energy per month than before the renovations – at a cost of $16,533. By comparison, the average American household consumes 11,040 kWh in an entire year, according to the Energy Information Administration.
So says the Tennessee Center for Policy Research June 17. We have always known that Al had problems doing for himself what he tells others to do.

Then again,
In the wake of becoming the most well-known global warming alarmist, Gore won an Oscar, a Grammy and the Nobel Peace Prize. In addition, Gore saw his personal wealth increase by an estimated $100 million thanks largely to speaking fees and investments related to global warming hysteria.
He can afford it.



17, 22, and Green

This blog is turning green, not because of any environmental message, but to celebrate the Boston Celtics, who won probably the most lop-sided Game 6's in NBA Finals history (39 point spread) against that team from the west, to win their 17th NBA Championship, and the first in 22 years at Boston Garden. Yep, the long wait is over.

Here's what I wrote in August of last year. The answer is obvious (as it has always been): to help win a Championship.

Update June 30: I reverted back to the original colors.


Monday, June 16, 2008

Road trip

A quick trip to visit my parents in Polomolok, South Cotabato ended with a road trip that took me through six provinces to Cagayan de Oro City. A few days later I was one of the staff on a one-week seminar held at Mountain Pines Place, a conference center owned by Dr. Walter Brown on the foothills of Mt. Kitanglad in Kalugmanan, Monolo Fortich, Bukidnon. The one-week seminar allowed me to recover from that road trip.

Wednesday, June 11, 2008

The Beasts and the Children

Anything for the money? Is this how UNICEF does its work now? UNICEF entered into a memorandum of agreement with the International Islamic Relief Organization "in-line with UNICEF's policy that encourages the exchange of expertise and experiences regionally and internationally; and to collaborate and join forces as part of the Millennium Development Goals (MDGS) ... It's also one of UNICEF's strategic goals to provide what is in the best interest of children. Building partnerships with leading organizations like the International Relief organization is the result of our trust in their continuous and effective efforts to protect and secure a better future for children."

It would seem that there is nothing wrong with it. Until you get to know that two branches of the IIRO in the Philippines and Indonesia have been listed as "terrorist organizations for providing money and support to Al Qaida-linked groups, notably Abu Sayyaf (ASG) in the Philippines and Jemaah Islamiyah (JI) in Indonesia." UN herself says so too.

Then again, it would not be surprising as UNICEF has been doing the dance of death with groups like Planned Parenthood. And to think that some UNICEF branches in the past did not accept donations from a biscuit company whose mother company was also involved in the manufacture of tobacco (dangerous to children), nor from a company that produces adhesives, one of which is glue used as adhesives for some parts of landmines (many victims of landmines have been children), nor from someone who owns a diversified group of companies, one of which is a leading liquor manufacturing company (how safe is this stuff for children?).

Monday, May 26, 2008

UN-humanitarian aid

You don't want to hear of so many deaths from natural disasters? Easy. The less people, the less deaths to report. UN-believable.

H/T: Michelle Malkin

Friday, May 23, 2008

Thursday, May 22, 2008

PBA

I just had to post this. I try to make this blog "safe". Although I do not care so much now who the Americans are voting for in November, I have apprehensions over what the next POTUS can do. One conservative blogger said once that if the two candidates for President of the United States are not 100% pro-life, then they can hang it up as a country. It is no wonder that some Republicans will sit out this year's elections.

At the very least, McCain seems to be anti-abortion, while the two Democrats have always been pro-aborts. B. Hussein (and his wife, no less) has always been against the ban on Partial-Birth Abortions. And everyone knows Congress can always repeal laws. An anti-life President with an anti-life Congress can always change the existing law.

In one of Jill Stanek blogposts recently, a commenter left the photoshopped image (shown here) of a photo Jill had in her post. This is how that commenter sees B. Hussein in his PBA stance (caution: very graphic)


South Point Divers at Lemlunay

Sunstar General Santos has a feature entitled "Going to 'paradise' depths". It talks of the Partridge Family's South Point Divers at Lemlunay Resort.

Here's part of it:

As part of the province's tourism circuit, the resort boost of its scuba diving services through a diving shop called South Point Divers.

Sitting some 20 feet above the sea level, the 3.5-hectare property owned by the Partridge family saw its potentials not too quickly.


"This used to be our private, weekend hide-away, where the cabins are good only for the family members. But soon family friends keep coming and borrow the keys. That's the shortcut to the story why we are now operating commercially," recalled Paul Partridge, the resort manager and a certified dive instructor.
It was his father, Don, an American national, who bought the property 17 years ago after retiring from Dole Philippines Inc.

Read the rest here. The website is here.








Here's the link to Mel Ledesma's blog entry "Lemlunay" (you need to scroll down to see).

Wednesday, May 21, 2008

Requiem for UK fathers

The British Parliament just voted out the fathers. Times Online reports that:

Single women and lesbian couples won landmark parental rights last night as MPs voted to remove the requirement that fertility clinics consider a child’s need for a father.

The Human Fertilisation and Embryology Bill will replace the rule with a “need for supportive parenting” after opponents were defeated in two votes by unexpectedly wide margins.

The Government had been prepared for defeat but won the free votes by majorities of 75 and 68. The decisions mean that the legislation will grant the most significant extension to homosexual family rights since gay adoption was sanctioned.

It will stop fertility clinics turning away lesbians and single women because their children will not have a father or male role model. While the current law does not block such therapy, it is sometimes used to justify refusals.


It was bad enough that the UK pushed for IVF and related acts in the Bill in question. It is even worse now as "fathers" are deemed insignificant -- even as that other "half" of the equation is needed to have a child. Then again, this is just an off-shoot, an expected consequence of the tampering of the natural order.

And the proposal to lower the limit for abortions (from the legal 24 weeks), well, 24 weeks it still is.

So what can they think of next, human-animal hybrid embryos? Oh, shoots, they actually thought of that too. Here.

Possible now? H/T: Andrea Mrozek.
(without prejudice to the Narnia Chronicles I love)



Mary in May

Last week, Rachel Balducci wrote about Mary. In part:

Mary had Jesus in her care for so many years – from the moment he was born until the moment he died. She was with Jesus in all these same moments that I am with my own boys – from watching him discover the Father’s creation to frantically searching when he was lost in the temple.

Part of what I love so much about Mary, about her role in our faith, is that she makes Jesus real to us. Regardless of whether you are raising boys or girls or not raising children at all, thinking about Mary’s relationship to Jesus is a reminder that he came to live on this earth – and that she was in charge of him. What a daunting task! But Mary answered the call – she raised God’s son, the boy sent to become a man and then die on a cross so that the rest of us could, with God’s grace, get into Heaven.

Some days, I feel overwhelmed by what God has asked me to do as a mother. He has put me in charge of these precious souls, and it’s my responsibility as their mother to teach them so many things. Some days I feel tired and run down and also (on particularly bad days) distracted and annoyed.

And then I think of Mary, and all the years she raised her boy. Her continual yes to the Father, on a daily basis, is what gives us the grace to do the same. She deserves so much more than a mere month. She deserves our devotion and gratitude.

You can read the rest here.

True, May is the month dedicated to Mary. One Marian tradition is the pilgrimage. Of course, one can organize a BIG pilgrimage to a shrine dedicated to Our Lady (Lourdes, Fatima, maybe?). But you can also go on a small one but BIG in devotion. Organize with family or friends a pilgrimage: praying a part of the Holy Rosary toward the shrine (walking or riding, depends on the distance), praying the part of the day (with Litany of the Blessed Virgin Mary) at the shrine, and then praying another set of mysteries away from the shrine.

In Cebu, there is Simala in Sibonga,
Our Lady @ Simala

Schoenstatt in Talisay City,
Our Lord and Our Lady @ Schoenstatt

or Virgin of the Rule in Lapu-Lapu City.



Monday, May 19, 2008

Another hero

Research meteorologist Tom Knutson of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's fluid dynamics lab in Princeton, N.J. used to warn "about the harmful effects of climate change and has even complained in the past about being censored by the Bush administration on past studies on the dangers of global warming." (foxnews.com). Now he is blowing from the other direction. In a recent study, he argues "against the notion that we've already seen a really dramatic increase in Atlantic hurricane activity resulting from greenhouse warming." (foxnews.com). One by one they're won over.

We don't know about Big Al, though. Now he even equates heroes who founded America and heroes of World War II's war against fascism to those who fight against global warming, a "third hero generation in American history." Yep, we are all sidekicks!

Opposition from the good?

Apparently, not only did Pope Benedict XVI's baptism of Corriere della Sera deputy editor Magdi Cristiano Allam last Easter sit well with the Muslims, it ruffled others' feathers. If this is to be believed, although there is no reason to doubt, then I repeat the question. I do not know much about Comboni's group though.

There, but not quite

I thought I was dreaming when I read an anti-GWA news story in the Philippine Daily Inquirer.

"HUMANS MAY BE TAKING TOO much of the blame for climate change when it is largely triggered by natural causes, a biologist from the University of the Philippines said, citing nine errors in former US Vice President Al Gore’s documentary, “An Inconvenient Truth.”

"The award-winning and fourth highest-grossing documentary film ever showed the grim consequences of global warming with anthropogenic or human-caused greenhouse gases as the main culprit.

"But Dr. Perry Ong, director of the Institute of Biology at the UP College of Science, said human-induced global warming was among many environmental problems that interacted in the “eternal tug of war” between global warming and cooling.

"Popular explanations on the warming of the earth identified humans as being mainly responsible for influencing the climate through greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions.

"According to the documentary, for which Gore was awarded the 2007 Nobel Peace Prize (together with the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change or IPCC), greenhouse gases emitted by humans were accountable for the death of polar bears, the melting of the snows of Mt. Kilimanjaro and the dehydration of Lake Chad, among others.

"Ong said GHGs spawned by humans contribute merely 33 percent to global warming compared to the 67 percent traced to natural causes, which include changes in solar radiation, volcanic eruptions and the shifting of the Earth’s tilt and orbit.

“Humankind is guilty of a lot of crimes against the Earth and pumping greenhouse gases is just one among many,” Ong stressed.

"The scientist echoed an unconventional and less popular view on such a “hyped up” environmental issue during his lecture at the UP Diliman on Wednesday."


Oh boy, he is a marked man.

But I would say he isn't so much as a "skeptic" really when he says this:
"The surging human population must also be countered so as not to compound other serious environmental issues. More people would mean more deforestation, more demand for food and more loss of biodiversity."

There, but not quite.

Celtic pride & gay marriage plume

The image “http://www.nba.com/media/celtics/header_playoffs_celtics480100.jpg” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors.

Celtics in 7! Nuff said.

Now, although, I had second thoughts about putting what follows in the same post as the Celtics's going through to the Eastern Conference Finals, I had to, since there is a link. Boston leads the way -- in many ways, like, how the Celtics made one of the best turnarounds in NBA history. Massachusetts leads all states in "the fundamental constitutional right to form a family relationship", a.k.a gay marriage.

With the California Supreme Court's 4-3 decision last week against a ban on gay marriages, despite a previous 61% majority vote in 2000 to reaffirm the 1977 state law that defines marriage as the union of a man and a woman, all is not lost. Pro-family groups are working towards putting on the ballot in November a constitutional amendment to make the CSC's decision moot.

Michelle M. quotes "Conservative religious organizations have submitted more than 1.1 million signatures for an initiative that would amend the state Constitution to outlaw same-sex marriage. If at least 694,354 signatures are found to be valid, a tally that is due by mid-June, the measure would go on the November ballot and, if approved by voters, would override any court ruling in favor of same-sex marriage."

In a quote by Dawn Eden (May 16) of Elizabeth Fox-Genovese, I put a link here of what Elizabeth wrote in her last book on Massachusetts's approval of gay marriages.

In part, as Dawn quotes:

"Many Americans, who come to see same-sex marriage as just another step in marriage’s evolution, will accept the public pronouncements that they are doing no more than supporting 'fairness' by extending some valuable benefits to people of the same sex who happen to love each other and wish to live together without shame or stigma. What could be more innocuous? But for the hardcore activists, the real goal is the destruction of marriage as the union of a man and a woman. They aim to discredit all forms of authority—especially God and nature—that dare to tell people how to lead their lives. In the view of queer activists, desire, like love in Carmen’s 'Habenera,' knows no law—nor should any be imposed upon it.

"In the current climate, the appeal of their position is not hard to understand, especially since most of those who accept it do not begin to understand its implications. If anything, the defense of same-sex marriage looks like yet another logical step in the gradual increase in freedom for all members of society. And since activists, the courts, and the media overwhelmingly encourage this deception, we may readily understand that many people may come to see same-sex marriage as another blow against outmoded and illegitimate forms of authority—a blow for freedom and equality. Buying into this view, however, they will remain blind to the ways in which they are playing into the hands of vast governmental and economic powers. The freedom for gays and lesbians to marry will decisively contribute to disaggregating all of the remaining social institutions that provide the foundations for any collective resistance against political and economic domination."


See also Maggie Gallagher at Mercatornet.com.


Thursday, May 15, 2008

Justine-credible

She announced her retirement from professional tennis. She says she'll teach tennis at her academy. Just google. I cannot link. Am affected ;-).

Allez! Your still #1!
Photo SI.com/AP

Update: Justine asked the ATP to take her name off the standings. This will put Masha at the top of the list by May 19.

Wednesday, May 14, 2008

Usher in Asher

Jill Stanek blogs about another baby miracle.
The story is here.
Image from the story.



Flight risk

One of my pet peeves. Although I am not clear about the level of risk of cellphone use during flights, what I just cannot understand is why some airline passengers cannot follow regulations. Philippine domestic flights are very notorious for such behavior. In the US, airlines actually coordinate with police and prosecute. This recently reported on a Southwest Airlines flight.

I experienced something similar on a flight from Cagayan de Oro to Cebu. Someone took a call as we were descending, less than 5 minutes to landing. Someone shouted at the man "Turn that off!". And it wasn't any of the flight attendants. I learned that the screamer's usual internet handle starts with Forza. Boy, he could have been ticketed also for causing scandal by shouting and waking up some dozing passengers (who also had their phones on silent mode, for sure).

If only we can eject them off their seats!

And the Southwest Airlines cellphone-talking man, Mr. Jones, is president of Skyonic Corp. that specializes in cleaning emissions from coal-fired power plants.

Lefty GWA for sure! Not unusual behavior at all!
You-listen-to-me-only-coz-I-don't-care-what-you-say.

Monday, May 12, 2008

Courage to make the call

Kansas Archbishop Joseph Naumann has asked the governor, Kathleen Sebelius, not to take the Holy Eucharist at communion because of her veto of the Comprehensive Abortion Reform Act (HS SB 389) that would have strengthened Kansas's anti-abortion legislation. In a public letter, the Archbishop made it clear what the governor ought to do: (in part, following)

What makes the governor’s actions and advocacy for legalized abortion, throughout her public career, even more painful for me is that she is Catholic. Sadly, Governor Sebelius is not unique in being a Catholic politician supporting legalized abortion.

Since becoming archbishop, I have met with Governor Sebelius several times over many months to discuss with her the grave spiritual and moral consequences of her public actions by which she has cooperated in the procurement of abortions performed in Kansas. My concern has been, as a pastor, both for the spiritual well-being of the governor but also for those who have been misled (scandalized) by her very public support for legalized abortion.

It has been my hope that through this dialogue the governor would come to understand her obligation: 1) to take the difficult political step, but necessary moral step, of repudiating her past actions in support of legalized abortion; and 2) in the future would use her exceptional leadership abilities to develop public policies extending the maximum legal protection possible to the unborn children of Kansas.

Having made every effort to inform and to persuade Governor Sebelius and after consultation with Bishop Ron Gilmore (Dodge City), Bishop Paul Coakley (Salina) and Bishop Michael Jackels (Wichita), I wrote the governor last August requesting that she refrain from presenting herself for reception of the Eucharist until she had acknowledged the error of her past positions, made a worthy sacramental confession and taken the necessary steps for amendment of her life which would include a public repudiation of her previous efforts and actions in support of laws and policies sanctioning abortion.

Recently, it came to my attention that the governor had received holy Communion at one of our parishes. I have written to her again, asking her to respect my previous request and not require from me any additional pastoral actions.

The governor has spoken to me on more than one occasion about her obligation to uphold state and federal laws and court decisions. I have asked her to show a similar sense of obligation to honor divine law and the laws, teaching and legitimate authority within the church.


Do we have the courage to do this in the Philippines?

Thursday, May 08, 2008

Happy conservative

Is not an oxymoron. Happy is redundant.

Foxnews reports on a study funded by the (US) National Science Foundation and appearing in the June issue of the journal Pschological Science that found that:

"Individuals with conservative ideologies are happier than liberal-leaners, and new research pinpoints the reason: Conservatives rationalize social and economic inequalities.

"Regardless of marital status, income or church attendance, right-wing individuals reported greater life satisfaction and well-being than left-wingers, the new study found.

"Conservatives also scored highest on measures of rationalization, which gauge a person's tendency to justify, or explain away, inequalities...

"Our research suggests that inequality takes a greater psychological toll on liberals than on conservatives apparently because liberals lack ideological rationalizations that would help them frame inequality in a positive (or at least neutral) light."

Tuesday, May 06, 2008

Flygirl

Here's a link to flygirl's blog. If you see pix of her, you would think she couldn't handle the workhorse chopper, the Huey. Yep, she's a pilot alright.

She has also pix taken of mostly Mindanao places from the chopper. She's certified with the stick now so maybe the aerial pix might not be as much in the more recent blogs, so you need to go back previous posts to see more shots as she sat on the left.

Oh, the link: http://flygirl01.blogspot.com/

Wednesday, April 30, 2008

True color

Global warming alarmists are at it again. It is a cyclic blame-game. They start or end with the usual suspect (more like, the guilty): people and their procreative powers (and traditional religion).

Don Feder writes at frontpagemagazine.com:

Global Warming: The Left's Latest War on the Family
By Don Feder
GrassTopsUSA.com | Tuesday, April 29, 2008

Procreation is killing the planet, and traditional religion is to blame, Global-Warming cultists insist.

First the industrial revolution had to go. Then it was to the wall with oil company executives, those malignant Carbon Interests. Next, SUVs were declared enemies of the planet.

Now, the left's attention has shifted back to its perennial targets -- large families and "patriarchal" religion. ...


So if we cut down on world population, who will invest in green? Also, I thought that the science is settled, that we are doomed. Then why is Al and company still doing the green investments thingy? You want to be rich, invest in his Climate Solutions Fund. They just closed a $683M fund. Woohoo.


Gore investment body closes $683m fund
By Fiona Harvey in London

The investment vehicle headed by Al Gore has closed a new $683m fund to invest in early-stage environmental companies and has mounted a robust defence of green investing.

The Climate Solutions Fund will be one of the biggest in the growing market for investment funds with an environmental slant.

The fun
d will be focused on equity investments in small companies in four sectors: renewable energy; energy efficiency technologies; energy from biofuels and biomass; and the carbon trading markets.

This is the second fund from Generation Investment Management, chaired by the former vice-president of the US and managed by David Blood, former head of Goldman Sachs Asset Management.

The first, the Global Equity Strategy Fund, has $2.2bn invested in large companies the company judges have “sustainable“ businesses, from an environmental, social and economic viewpoint. Mr Blood said he expected that fund to be worth $5bn within two years, based on commitments from interested investors.


True color. Gr$$n. (Bruce Banner when his angry?)



Tuesday, April 29, 2008

Painless

I have a fear of needles. When it's annual check-up time, my veins will usually play hide-and-seek, to almost the consternation of medtechs. I just feel so much pain.

Today was annual check-up time at CITE. While the medtech found the right vein in my arm after much probing and prodding, as usual, I will say the medtech was good. I didn't feel anything. She was the best, so far.

Of course, somebody had to spoil my joy. They used smaller needles. Still, since I didn't see the needle as I look away, I'll say it was the best "experience" by far.

But wait till the resuts . . .






Lover of truth

Today, 29 April, the Church celebrates the feast of St. Catherine of Siena, known as the person who "implored the (P)ope, Gregory XI, to leave Avignon, to reform the clergy and the administration of the Papal States, and ardently threw herself into his design for a crusade, in the hopes of uniting the powers of Christendom against the infidels, and restoring peace to Italy by delivering her from the wandering companies of mercenary soldiers." (from Catholic Encyclopedia).

Even as she was never formally schooled, she is known to be one of the most brilliant theological minds. She was proclaimed Doctor of the Church, the first woman to be given that title (together with St Teresa of Avila). She was a lover of truth and was known to tell Church and government officials how to behave. Must be God's gift, because they'd follow her.

Can we ever have another Catherine of Siena, who is courageous enough to "remind" us of our rightful place in this world?

Monday, April 21, 2008

Feeding frenzy

Eric feeding the fish at Binukbok Resort. I still used a Sony-Ericsson k800i.

Nemo at Binukbok

Nemo at Binukbok Resort, San Luis, Batangas.



I used a Sony-Ericsson k800i in a waterproof soft-plastic case.

Friday, March 28, 2008

No mas

A story of conversion.

There was a priest in Mexico who went looking for a Crucifix for a chapel. He saw one in an old shop, and even if the cross was very worn out, the corpus was still in very good condition. He decided to purchase the Crucifix, thinking that replacing the cross was easy.

He asked a carpenter-sculptor to come to the chapel and see what can be done with the Crucifix. The man took off the corpus and brought the cross to his shop, where he fabricated another one to replace the worn out cross.

When he finished, he brought the new cross to the priest, who was happy with what the carpenter did. Before he paid him and sent him away, the priest asked him "to finish the job" by attaching the corpus to the cross. The man took the cross and the corpus to the work area of the chapel and started "crucifying" the corpus Christi.

As he was in progress, the man started to cry. When the priest arrived to check on his work, he saw the man crying. When he asked him what was wrong, the man told the priest, "No mas. No mas. For most of my life I have been crucifying our Lord over and over again with the the many wrongs I have done, the many sins I have committed. This is the last time."

Tuesday, March 25, 2008

Show me some class

I first saw her a few moments before my flight was called when she walked past me. She had class -- her beauty and her clothes, footwear, everything about her. I took my time even as my flight was called. I usually do that anyway. Not one to join the rush. Besides I almost always get an aisle seat (in Ceb-speak, a charlie or delta seat), so I do not have to rush.

As I entered the aircraft, I checked my boarding pass. 11D. I smiled and thought. I can react to this in two ways: as I was clearly to be seated in an emergency exit row (10 or 11), either the lady at the check-in counter saw how big I was so with all charity she placed me in that seat, or it was pure coincidence, as I never asked for it. Either way I was happy.

When I reached Row 11, I saw, seated on 11E, the lady with class.

As the flight progressed, I observed, not intentionally, that she had a diamond encrusted ring on her finger (married, lucky hubby!) and a lady's Rolex watch. Class. I say not intentionally, as she was reading the inflight magazine, and her left arm and hand just inside my peripheral vision.

As is usual in this airline's Manila flights, the game was called. It was the show me game. I don't like this game because I never win that game. Usually the gamemaster asks things that can be found in one's wallet or person; the more common ones: picture of your mother-in-law; senior citizen ID; Sun SIM; ticket -- lottery and bus tickets most popular. I don't win because I do not have the habit of having my wallet in my pocket (it's in the bag in the luggage bin above), and even if by teeny chance I have it, I would not have any of those things in it. If you know me, you would understand.

Back to the lady with class. When game was called, she got her bag, opened it, and scooped her wallet even before the F/A explained the mechanics of the game. Who would have thought? Lady with class came prepared. When an "ID" was called, lady showed one, and she was first even, but it was the senior citizen card that the gamesmaster wanted. When "picture" was called, surely it was that of the mother-in-law, but lady did not have -- in my experience on those flights, only once was anyone able to show a picture -- that was a tough one, and no one on board had the photo this time. When "ticket" was called, she had her e-ticket raised, but alas, it was a lottery ticket that was required. When a "Sun SIM" card was called, she almost made it but somewhere upfront someone was quicker.

Not that the game isn't with class, but lady with class had no qualms trying to win one of the prizes. Who would have thought?

I like the Q&A game. So far I've won 2 shoe bags (I kept them), 1 plastic tumbler (kid beside me was the lucky recipient), 1 belt bag (gave to my sister's cleaning lady), and 1 waterproof pouch (gave to a co-participant in a seminar).

I have to admit that there was another thing lady with class did that made me think that, well, lady with class was still human. See, as I sat beside her, she was just about to finish the cola-drink-in-a-plastic cup that she was sipping. Gas in, gas out. She did it. Ever so quietly, she did it. Then, quietly, she also says "sorry".

Burp. She burped. What were you thinking?

Good Friday: Where is Jesus?

As the crucifix was being prepared for the veneration of the cross, a young boy, Paul (we later knew his name), maybe 5 years old, came up to one of the ministers (altar boys) holding the crucifix and asked him, "Where is Jesus?" Perhaps Paul was intrigued that the crucifix was covered with a purple veil. Paul could not wait for the veil to be taken off, so that he may see Jesus again. Many years have I attended this church for the Good Friday services and I could not remember that there was a corpus on this wooden cross. What I know is that it has on it a relic of the True Cross of Christ. How would Paul's reaction be when he finds out that Jesus isn't on the cross, once the veil is removed?

As the priest and the ministers slowly unveiled the veil in the usual Good Friday rite, Paul was there every step of the way, down the center aisle. When alas all of the veil was removed, at this time near the steps leading to the presbiterium, still there was no Jesus. How would Paul take it?

As he did not see Jesus, Paul positioned himself near the crucifix and sometimes followed even the priests who were concelebrating. No one shooed him away. He was looking for Jesus and he couldn't find him. He did not see Jesus. Jesus had been laid in the tomb.

I would not know if Paul attended the Easter Vigil Mass in the same Church. I wasn't there too as I went to another church. But if he did, even as that crucifix will have been kept, Paul would have seen Jesus again, as He is truly Risen.

Sunday, March 23, 2008

Celtics spoiler

Celtics lost to New Orleans, 106-113. Three out of four wasn't bad at all. Celtics now at 55-14.

Happy Easter y'all!!!

Friday, March 21, 2008

One more

The Celtics won over the Mavericks in the third road game the Celtics had in Texas, 94-90. Ray Allen was sent in at 1:54 left in the game and scored a triple that won the game for the Celtics.


Wednesday, March 19, 2008

Two down

The Celtics snuffed the firepower out of the Rockets, 94-74, on the Celtics's 2nd game on a four-game road trip to the West. The Rockets's win streak stops.

Tuesday, March 18, 2008

One down, three to go

The Celtics are on the road in the West for a 4-game schedule. While they played against "my team from the West" today (SA Spurs), I was still for the green-and-white. With a 22-point deficit at half-time, the Celtics worked hard for a come-from-behind victory, sparked by a less-than-a-minute-to-play triple from Celtic newcomer Sam Cassell. Celtics won 93-91.

Next stop: Rockets. Will Celtics play spoiler for the winning-streaking team from Houston?

Image from nba.com/celtics

Monday, March 17, 2008

Arctic ocean is warming up

If you read this (below in blue) today, would you agree?:

The Arctic ocean is warming up, icebergs are growing scarcer and in some places the seals are finding the water too hot, according to a report to the Commerce Department yesterday from Consul Ifft, at Bergen, Norway.


Reports from fishermen, seal hunters and explorers, he declared, all point to a radical change in climate conditions and hitherto unheard-of temperatures in the Arctic zone. Exploration expeditions report that scarcely any ice has been met with as far north as 81 degrees 29 minutes. Soundings to a depth of 3,100 meters showed the gulf stream still very warm.


Great masses of ice have been replaced by moraines of earth and stones, the report continued, while at many points well known glaciers have entirely disappeared. Very few seals and no white fish are found in the eastern Arctic, while vast shoals of herring and smelts, which have never before ventured so far north, are being encountered in the old seal fishing grounds.


If you knew that this was written in the Nov. 2, 1922 edition of The Washington Post: Arctic Ocean Getting Warm; Seals Vanish and Icebergs Melt, by the Associated Press, what would you feel? Thought so too.

H/T Wattsupwiththat.

Wednesday, March 12, 2008

Manhattan Declaration on Climate Change

Manhattan Declaration on Climate Change

"Global warming" is not a global crisis

We, the scientists and researchers in climate and related fields, economists, policymakers, and business leaders, assembled at Times Square, New York City, participating in the 2008 International Conference on Climate Change,

Resolving that scientific questions should be evaluated solely by the scientific method;

Affirming that global climate has always changed and always will, independent of the actions of humans, and that carbon dioxide (CO2) is not a pollutant but rather a necessity for all life;

Recognising that the causes and extent of recently observed climatic change are the subject of intense debates in the climate science community and that oft-repeated assertions of a supposed 'consensus' among climate experts are false;

Affirming that attempts by governments to legislate costly regulations on industry and individual citizens to encourage CO2 emission reduction will slow development while having no appreciable impact on the future trajectory of global climate change. Such policies will markedly diminish future prosperity and so reduce the ability of societies to adapt to inevitable climate change, thereby increasing, not decreasing, human suffering;

Noting that warmer weather is generally less harmful to life on Earth than colder:

Hereby declare:

That current plans to restrict anthropogenic CO2 emissions are a dangerous misallocation of intellectual capital and resources that should be dedicated to solving humanity's real and serious problems.

That there is no convincing evidence that CO2 emissions from modern industrial activity has in the past, is now, or will in the future cause catastrophic climate change.

That attempts by governments to inflict taxes and costly regulations on industry and individual citizens with the aim of reducing emissions of CO2 will pointlessly curtail the prosperity of the West and progress of developing nations without affecting climate.

That adaptation as needed is massively more cost-effective than any attempted mitigation and that a focus on such mitigation will divert the attention and resources of governments away from addressing the real problems of their peoples.

That human-caused climate change is not a global crisis.

Now, therefore, we recommend --

That world leaders reject the views expressed by the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change as well as popular, but misguided works such as "An Inconvenient Truth."

That all taxes, regulations, and other interventions intended to reduce emissions of CO2 be abandoned forthwith.

Agreed at New York, 4 March 2008


See a commentary here.

Tuesday, March 11, 2008

Klinsmann is back

Who would have known? Bayern Munich is giving the reins to Jürgen Klinsmann at the end of this season, a two-year contract worth $12.3 million annually. Why? The answer, according to Nick Bidwell, "is Germany's third-place finish at the '06 World Cup, a tournament the team illuminated with its heart and attacking élan."

Let's see how he fares at Bayern Munich, a club that already features German soccer greats club president Beckenbauer, Rummenigge, Hoeness, and board advisor Paul Breitner at headquarters, and of course, goalkeeper Oliver Kahn in the field.


Monday, March 10, 2008

Why computer models won't always work

Richard W. Rahn, chairman of the Institute for Global Economic Growth, writes in the Washington Times his commentary entitled "Model scams". He starts with this:

Experts use mathematical models to give us predictions about the future. Rank the following events according to the ability of the model builders to give accurate forecasts:

(A) The winner of the 2008 presidential election.

(B) The size of the U.S. budget deficit for the year 2009.

(C) The official low temperature in Chicago on April 1, 2008.

(D) The number of hurricanes that will strike Florida in 2010.

(E) The rise in the sea level over the next 100 years.

(F) The average temperature for the year 2100.


It's more towards the right on the global warming debate. But of course.

Racism in Europe?

I have heard many say that racism in Europe is more widespread than in any continent. In 1990, when I was in Italy, I felt that this was true; not towards me, but most especially towards blacks -- the polizia and the carabinieri had more surprise inspections of groups of blacks, but not without justified reasons most times. Racism in sports, especially football, has been a concern and advocacies have not been few (examples: Football Against Racism Europe (FARE), Let's Kick Racism Out of Football, and Campaign for Racial Equality). Sadly, though, even legitimate police actions against minorities are almost always slapped with the racism absolute moral authority card.

And it does not get any better, it seems. Even global warming alarmists seem to show their "racist tendencies", in the guise of genuine concern for climate change -- in reality, in their own words, "security implications and the dangers to European interests thrown up by climate change". Europe will be deluged by the "environmental migrants." Seems like they are saying: Hell, no. If governments will not act on climate change, then we will have more of these migrants in Europe.

Now who is really fear-mongering? Read here.

Friday, March 07, 2008

"Virgin monologues"

Something I picked up from Jill Stanek. I liked that she also gave some credit to fathers when she said, "What wonderful role models. We need to pray they stand strong. Note one commonality: fathers who are involved and positive role models."

She wrote about the band Jonas Brothers and Dancing with the Stars' Julianne Hough, on "true love waits". Here's the link (with comments).